WEBVTT

00:03.980 --> 00:08.980
In 2008, Dell, I left my group practice and started Integrative Pediatrics and about a

00:08.980 --> 00:14.840
thousand patients joined me. We grew that practice to over 15,000 active patients over a matter of

00:14.840 --> 00:22.720
just a few years. And it was in around the time, oh, 2016, I wrote the vaccine-friendly plan.

00:22.840 --> 00:27.300
That's when I created the dataset that became the publication, published in a peer review

00:27.300 --> 00:32.960
journal, this vax-on-vax study that's based on real-world data of over 3,000 patients,

00:32.960 --> 00:38.760
all every single patient born into my practice from the day I opened my door to the day we closed

00:38.760 --> 00:44.640
this dataset was included. No exclusions like you see done by the pharma studies that they cherry

00:44.640 --> 00:48.440
pick who they're going to look at. This is every single patient born into the practice.

00:48.700 --> 00:53.940
I was a pro-vaccine doctor trained mainstream. And when I started hearing patients telling me,

00:53.960 --> 00:57.560
and I started seeing it for myself, all these medical chronic conditions that

00:58.000 --> 01:01.840
are clearly more prevalent in the highly vaccinated, I thought, wow,

01:01.840 --> 01:07.560
how do we ever get the world to see what I'm seeing? And what we did to really make sure we

01:07.560 --> 01:13.840
were comparing apples to apples was there were 500 and some unvaccinated, no vaccines at all.

01:14.020 --> 01:20.820
We age matched those 500 to 500 vaccinated kids. Now, realize these are variably vaccinated.

01:20.940 --> 01:25.260
They're not CDC scheduled vaccinated kids. Actually, some wise person, it might have been

01:25.260 --> 01:29.140
you. I forget who said, why don't you do a quality assurance analysis of your data? I thought,

01:29.140 --> 01:35.300
yeah, why don't I? I mean, in medicine, if you do an intervention, like any change to what's normally

01:35.300 --> 01:40.080
being done, a really ethical thing to do is to look at the outcome of that intervention.

01:40.460 --> 01:46.220
So that's what we did on November 23, 2020. We published this study in a peer review journal

01:46.220 --> 01:50.780
in Dell. It was rigorously peer reviewed. It took months to get it through that process.

01:50.840 --> 01:56.000
But the data that you shared, it's there. It's powerful. Even in the lighter vaccine

01:56.000 --> 02:01.440
schedule, you see this dramatic difference in all of these illnesses in just those that had

02:01.440 --> 02:05.020
this lighter vaccine schedule compared to those that didn't get the vaccines at all.

02:05.200 --> 02:11.560
For eye infections, way up in the vaccinated ear infections, throat infections, allergies,

02:12.180 --> 02:18.260
and then you go on down for lung infections, take it to the whole body, ADD, ADHD, anemia,

02:18.820 --> 02:24.600
all significantly increased. I mean, the curves are just astounding. You'll see on the

02:24.600 --> 02:29.260
summary, the orange curve for those with vaccines just goes up and up and up over the years.

02:29.660 --> 02:34.560
And it's almost flat line for the unvaxxed. My unvaxxed were never ill, but to see it

02:34.560 --> 02:39.940
in a peer reviewed, rigorously reviewed journal article, the data which was blinded

02:39.940 --> 02:43.260
and then reviewed and brought to the public speaks for itself.